Evidence for science advice and diplomacy: Considering quality, equity, and diversity of sources:

As the challenges we face become more complex and interactive, we are more aware than ever of the limits of so-called ‘technical advice.’  Expanding the sources of evidence has emerged as one response to addressing the structural inequalities that can be perpetuated by conventional methodologies of evidence formulation. Moreover, evidence pluralism can help position science advice to play a central role in addressing inequality for more just transitions. What (and whose) evidence counts, when, and under what conditions?  

At the same time, while broadening the sources and types of evidence can help to engender equity of outcomes for, and the trust of those not typically represented, some have raised concerns about the quality of evidence according to established standards. This engaging panel, a collaborative effort between INGSA's Francophone Division, the Global Commission on Evidence, and the School of Public Policy at Georgia Tech, brings together a distinguished group of experts to explore the ways that societies create and legitimize diverse sources of knowledge and build trust in the quality of such of evidence to inform policy.

Panelists:

• Mathieu Ouimet: Professor of Political Science and Directeur général du Réseau Francophone International en Conseil Scientifique – Canada

• Cassidy Sugimoto: Tom and Marie Patton School Chair in the School of Public Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology – USA

• Fadi El-Jardali: Director, WHO Collaborating Center for Evidence-Informed Policy and Practice – Lebanon

• Dorothy Ngila: Director of Strategic Partnerships, The National Research Foundation of South Africa (NRF) – South Africa

• Thema Monroe-White: Assistant Professor in the Department of Technology, Entrepreneurship, and Data Analytics, Berry College – USA

• John Lavis: Director, McMaster Health Forum - Canada